[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45CC9257.8080806@free.fr>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:25:11 +0100
From: John <linux.kernel@...e.fr>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...esys.com>, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
mingo@...e.hu, johnstul@...ibm.com, akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: One-shot high-resolution POSIX timer periodically late
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 11:25 +0100, John wrote:
>
>> Are there people that use the -rt patch set in real industrial applications?
>
> Yes. But we use a stabilized version of 2.6.16-rt29.
> http://www.osadl.org/projects/downloads/preempt-rt/linux-2.6.16/
Thanks for the pointer.
I'm confused: patch-2.6.16-rt29-tglx3 is dated 2006-09-07, yet there
have been numerous revisions of the -rt patch set since then. Does that
mean that no serious bugs have been found since September? Do the -rt
patch sets for 2.6.17 - 2.6.20 only bring new features and/or adapt the
-rt infrastructure to the newer kernels?
>> It seems that, if an important bug is found in the -rt part, I will have
>> to either upgrade to the latest kernel, or back port all the -rt changes
>> to the kernel I chose for my application?
>
> Yep.
Ouch :-)
I think I'll try my luck with 2.6.20 (it's been working so far).
By the way, I have a question: when I compile glibc for this system,
should I compile it against the vanilla 2.6.20 includes, or against the
patched 2.6.20-rt includes?
Regards.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists