[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702091212360.9007@d.namei>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:14:05 -0500 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6c/10] lguest: the guest code
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Len Brown wrote:
> On Friday 09 February 2007 05:57, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > + acpi_disabled = 1;
> > + acpi_ht = 0;
> > +#endif
>
> If this is hard-coded to have ACPI disabled, why isn't it enforced at build-time?
This is being disabled in the guest kernel only. The host and guest
kernels are expected to be the same build.
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists