[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070209200108.GA2510@infomag.infomag.iguana.be>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 21:01:08 +0100
From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
R.E.Wolff@...Wizard.nl, jrv@...zandt.mv.com, alex@...uxhacker.org,
support.linux@...ikey.com, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
tpmdd_devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, steve@...aho.co.uk,
hero@....uni-duisburg.de, fuganti@...ectiva.com.br, gorgo@....hu,
khollis@...gate.com, lethal@...ux-sh.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Char: timers cleanup
Hi Jiri,
> timers cleanup
>
> - Use timer macros to set function and data members and to modify
> expiration time.
> - Use DEFINE_TIMER for global timers and do not init them at run-time in
> these cases.
> - del_timer_sync is common in most cases -- we want to wait for timer
> function if it's still running.
For the watchdog drivers: the timers are only used if the watchdog is active.
Why should we not init them at run time but use the DEFINE_TIMER macro?
Personnaly I prefer to use the same syntax in all the watchdog drivers
(thus either DEFINE_TIMER or either setup_timer() ).
Greetings,
Wim.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists