| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1171057999.29713.129.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 21:53:19 +0000 From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...nvz.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, drepper@...hat.com Subject: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21 On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 21:49 +0000, Russell King wrote: > urgh, new system calls... wonder if they fit in the ARM ABI... Looks > fine. Can you elucidate on _what_ you just checked for? There was something about alignment of 64-bit arguments to syscalls which affects MIPS and/or ARM which I can't quite remember-- something about putting it them arguments in either an even-numbered or odd-numbered position to make it work nicely. Is that actually written anywhere, and does anyone bother to check? -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists