[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070209.142912.38710040.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 14:29:12 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ak@....de
Cc: virtualization@...ts.osdl.org, zach@...are.com,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, paulus@...ba.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/10] lguest code: the little linux hypervisor.
From: Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:50:06 +0100
>
> > Yes, it is a bit, umm, innovative. If it is going to be kept, even if
> > just for devel logging, you should disable interrupts around it.
> > Changing segments is not a normal thing to do.
>
> Actually that wouldn't be needed because interrupts are not allowed to do any
> user accesses. And contrary to the name it doesn't actually change
> the segment registers, only state used by *_user.
That's right and we use this construct all throughout the
syscall compatibility layer for 64-bit platforms.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists