[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070209164018.e4d29be0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:40:18 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Russ Cox" <rsc@...ch.com>
Cc: "Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@...redi.hu>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix quadratic behavior of shrink_dcache_parent()
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 19:23:31 -0500
"Russ Cox" <rsc@...ch.com> wrote:
> > "The file system mounted on /tmp/z in the example contains 2^50
> > directories". heh.
> >
> > I do wonder how realistic this problem is in real life.
>
> That's a fair concern, although I was trying this as part
> of evaluating how much someone could hose a system
> if we let them mount arbitrary FUSE servers. And the
> answer is: they could make it completely unusable,
> requiring reboot.
>
> I ran a later test that printed how deep it got into
> the file tree and it was only a few hundred thousand
> if I recall correctly. A determined attacker might even
> manage to do this in a normal file system.
>
> But sure, it's not a common case. ;-)
Well that's a good point - sometimes people do crazy things on purpose. We
were all University students once ;)
The patches look nice and as I said, potentially of some use for memory
reclaim. But I hope that someone who has worked on dcache.c more recently
than I has time to apply a toothcomb to this work.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists