[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <p73ps8igo0v.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
Date: 10 Feb 2007 14:06:40 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21
Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:
> Please just push the EDAC K8 stuff. Andi will say "no" from now until the
> end of time, but end users want it, distributions want it, and Andi is
> not the EDAC maintainer so should consider himself overruled on what
> isn't a technical issue but a personal political viewpoint.
Well it's a technical issue -- it conflicts with the machine check
code that is already implemented by stealing away its events.
You would first need a CONFIG_MCE=n on x86-64 at least, otherwise
one of them will be unhappy.
The other issue is that the existing code does everything EDAC
K8 does already perfectly fine, just in a small fraction of
the code.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists