[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200702101524.56098.ak@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 15:24:55 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: "Parag Warudkar" <parag.warudkar@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
joerg@...rops.han.de, dsd@...too.org, paulus@...ba.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, lethal@...ux-sh.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make aout executables work again
On Saturday 10 February 2007 14:50, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> > I already fixed this in a different way -- just use the stack
> > trampoline on a.out
> >
> > Can you double check
> >
> > ftp://ftp.firstfloor.org/pub/ak/x86_64/quilt/patches/aout-no-vdso
> >
> > works for you?
>
> Is there a reason why we specifically want to make a distinction
> between binfmts having and not having VDSOs and do we want aout to
> have the possibility of NOT having VDSO when a) It used to have it
> unconditionally b) nothing special is needed in arch or common code to
> have it and c) Not letting have it requires special arch-specific
> code* ?
I mainly did it this way because it was quite a lot simpler.
I'm not worrying too much about other strange binfmts to be honest
> [*] I see the patch handles i386 and x86_64 - but I am not sure if
> something similar will be needed for the other arches to allow aout
> executables in absence of VDSO (powerpc, sh).
Neither powerpc nor sh support a.out.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists