[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45CD0C07.5060601@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:04:23 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-aio@...ck.org, Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] Generic AIO by scheduling stacks
Linus Torvalds a écrit :
> Ok, here's another entry in this discussion.
>
> - IF the system call blocks, we call the architecture-specific
> "schedule_async()" function before we even get any scheduler locks, and
> it can just do a fork() at that time, and let the *child* return to the
> original user space. The process that already started doing the system
> call will just continue to do the system call.
Well, I guess if the original program was mono-threaded, and syscall used
fget_light(), we might have a problem here if the child try a close(). So you
may have to disable fget_light() magic if async call is the originator of the
syscall.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists