[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1171103527.29713.228.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 10:32:07 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...nvz.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21
On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 11:22 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> Which remembers me that I think that MIPS is using the non-compat version
> of sys_epoll_pwait for compat syscalls. But maybe MIPS doesn't need a compat
> syscall for some reason. Dunno.
It's OK as long as the 64-bit kernel, N32 and O32 userspace all agree
there there's 32 bits of padding between the fields of this structure:
struct epoll_event {
__u32 events;
__u64 data;
};
I suspect it's a fairly safe bet that N32 userspace agrees; if the O32
ABI is different then it would need the compat syscall.
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists