[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070210104712.GA20878@outpost.ds9a.nl>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 11:47:12 +0100
From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@...herlabs.nl>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-aio@...ck.org, Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] Generic AIO by scheduling stacks
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 02:33:01PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> - IF the system call blocks, we call the architecture-specific
> "schedule_async()" function before we even get any scheduler locks, and
> it can just do a fork() at that time, and let the *child* return to the
> original user space. The process that already started doing the system
> call will just continue to do the system call.
Ah - cool. The average time we have to wait is probably far greater than the
fork overhead, microseconds versus milliseconds.
However, and there probably is a good reason for this, why isn't it possible
to do it the other way around, and have the *child* do the work and the
original return to userspace?
Would confuse me at lot less in any case.
Bert
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists