[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1171236787.4493.132.camel@nigel.suspend2.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:33:06 +1100
From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
To: Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@...il.com>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tilman@...p.cc
Subject: Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
Hi.
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 03:25 +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
> On 2/12/07, Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net> wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 02:57 +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
> > > On 2/12/07, Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Neither am I. I'm just asking that new drivers have power management as
> > > > standard.
> >
> > > What if the hardware doesn't support power management ?
> >
> > You would still want to do the cleanup and configuration that you'd do
> > for module load/unload.
> >
> By adding dummy functions, wouldn't that just look awkward ?
If all you need to do is say 'I don't need to do anything' and we have a
shared function that does that, all we're talking about doing is adding
to your struct pci_device (or whatever)
.resume = generic_empty_resume;
To me at least, that doesn't look awkward, and says cleanly and clearly
that you've checked things over and decided you know what's required.
Regards,
Nigel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists