linux-kernel - Re: Recent and not-so problems with tifm_sd driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b637ec0b0702110652t67a4d9b5r74c85d69c3c7ca9b@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 11 Feb 2007 09:52:50 -0500
From:	"Fabio Comolli" <fabio.comolli@...il.com>
To:	"Brad Campbell" <brad@...p.net.au>,
	"Pierre Ossman" <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx>,
	"Alex Dubov" <oakad@...oo.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Recent and not-so problems with tifm_sd driver - one more

Hi.
I can see this problem too. I have CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED set.

It happens only with SD cards, with MMC everything is OK.

Fabio

On 2/11/07, Brad Campbell <brad@...p.net.au> wrote:
> Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > Alex Dubov wrote:
> >> One more problem (you may already know about it) - I was contacted by somebody from the hald
> >> project and indeed I can confirm that on 2.6.20 kernel hald fails to take action on card
> >> insertion. I can't see anything in my code so this may be a general mmc problem.
> >> The problem is described here:
> >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/hal/2007-January/006960.html
> >>
> >
> > Odd. This might be the whole sysfs restructuring thing causing problems. Can you
> > check if that user has CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED on?
>
> I've tested both with and without CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED on, both fail the same way.
> hald reports that the device has no parent and decides to ignore it.
>
> I've also tested both combinations against hal from ubuntu 6.06LTS and a more recent version
>
> brad@...aptop2:~$ hald --version
> HAL package version: 0.5.8.1
>
> Again with and without CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED and all combinations fail.
> Hal appears to go looking for /sys/block/mmcblk0/mmcblk0p1/range
>
> When it can't find it, it then looks for the parent of that to check what would be
> /sys/block/mmcblk0/range, Complains it can't find a parent for /sys/block/mmcblk0/mmcblk0p1 and just
> proceeds to ignore the event.
>
> Brad
> --
> "Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability
> to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable
> for their apparent disinclination to do so." -- Douglas Adams
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/