[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070212073807.A9CCA13D7F@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:38:07 +0100 (CET)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: patches@...-64.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH x86 for review II] [20/39] i386: Small cleanup to TLB flush code
- Remove outdated comment
- Use cpu_relax() in a busy loop
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
---
arch/i386/kernel/smp.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c
@@ -375,8 +375,7 @@ static void flush_tlb_others(cpumask_t c
/*
* i'm not happy about this global shared spinlock in the
* MM hot path, but we'll see how contended it is.
- * Temporarily this turns IRQs off, so that lockups are
- * detected by the NMI watchdog.
+ * AK: x86-64 has a faster method that could be ported.
*/
spin_lock(&tlbstate_lock);
@@ -401,7 +400,7 @@ static void flush_tlb_others(cpumask_t c
while (!cpus_empty(flush_cpumask))
/* nothing. lockup detection does not belong here */
- mb();
+ cpu_relax();
flush_mm = NULL;
flush_va = 0;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists