linux-kernel - Re: [IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <45D03A3F.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:58:23 +0000
From:	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
To:	"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	<tony.luck@...el.com>, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@....de>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)

>> > If Jan actually had a goal with that except making the code utterly
>> > unreadable he should try again with small patches that are well
>> > explained and do one thing at a at time.  (And cane be reviewed an
>> > improved on if needed.
>> 
>> As the topic says - the goal is to support Xen. 
>
>Xen the linux guest
>or
>Xen the hypervisor?
>
>if it's the later, why on earth would we want to uglyfy linux for it?
>(arguably it holds in the former case as well)

The former.

Jan


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/