linux-kernel - Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1171273544.6308.5.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:45:44 +0100
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@...il.com>
Cc:	nigel@...el.suspend2.net, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tilman@...p.cc
Subject: Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?


> 
> By adding dummy functions, wouldn't that just look awkward ?

not really; if you have a template


pm_no_suspend_needed
and
pm_no_restore_needed

functions, and just make it part of ALL device structs that don't need
it.. it's not that bad

or maybe 

pm_generic_no_suspend
pm_generic_no_resume

as names, more in line what we use elsewhere in the kernel
-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/