[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070212165207.GC17400@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:52:07 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
Cc: Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@...il.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tilman@...p.cc
Subject: Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
Hi!
> > > > > Neither am I. I'm just asking that new drivers have power management as
> > > > > standard.
> > >
> > > > What if the hardware doesn't support power management ?
> > >
> > > You would still want to do the cleanup and configuration that you'd do
> > > for module load/unload.
> > >
> > By adding dummy functions, wouldn't that just look awkward ?
>
> If all you need to do is say 'I don't need to do anything' and we have a
> shared function that does that, all we're talking about doing is adding
> to your struct pci_device (or whatever)
>
> .resume = generic_empty_resume;
>
> To me at least, that doesn't look awkward, and says cleanly and clearly
> that you've checked things over and decided you know what's required.
Actually, I'd like it to be
.resume = generic_empty_resume; /* Explain, why your driver needs no
resume */
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists