linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] make queue_delayed_work() friendly to flush

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070212000410.GA91@tv-sign.ru>
Date:	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 03:04:10 +0300
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] make queue_delayed_work() friendly to flush_fork()

On 02/11, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> 
> This makes impossible to use flush_fork(delayed_work->work) in addition
> to cancel_delayed_work/cancel_rearming_delayed_work, not good.

It turns out this patch is in fact bug-fix.

I didn't notice that we already have flush_fork(delayed_work) calls!

This means that
	workqueue-make-cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue-work-on-idle-dwork.patch
	and this patch

should go just after
	implement-flush_work.patch

Sorry for inconvenience, please apply.

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/