linux-kernel - Re: unfixed regression in 2.6.20-rc6 (since 2.6.19)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87odnzi9p0.fsf@semtex.sncag.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:10:03 +0100
From:	Rainer Weikusat <rainer.weikusat@...ag.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ag.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Subject: Re: unfixed regression in 2.6.20-rc6 (since 2.6.19)

Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 03:30:22PM +0100, Rainer Weikusat wrote:

[...]

>> If you want to fix it only if you can claim to have written the code,
>> fine.
>
> I do not claim I have rewritten the code, if you look, you get full
> authorship credit for this fix, I just say I restructured it a bit.

You have rewritten it to match set of popular beliefs I consider to be
misguided. This means _you_ are the author of this code and all I can
to is to basically accept that you have the power to force your
beliefs on others and I haven't. So be it. Could this be the end of
this useless discussion?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/