[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070212195732.GC5108@nifty>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:57:33 -0800
From: Valerie Henson <val_henson@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@....net>,
val_henson@...ux.interl.com, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Documenting MS_RELATIME
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:53:18PM +0200, Petri Kaukasoina wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:49:39PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > >The one problem with noatime is that mutt's 'new mail arrived' breaks
> >
> > Just why does not it use mtime then to check for New Mail Arrived, like
>
> I have always used:
>
> --enable-buffy-size Use file size attribute instead of access time
>
> Support was there at least in 1998, maybe before.
Good point. However, this works for mutt because new mail is an
append-only operation. Other apps don't have the guarantee that file
modifications that they care about will change the file size.
-VAL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists