[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1171312488.4081.6.camel@nigel.suspend2.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 07:34:48 +1100
From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
To: Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "Martin A. Fink" <fink@....mpg.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD
Hi Alan et al.
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 19:08 +0000, Alan wrote:
> I'm not sure you'll get 50MB/sec sustained to work although you might
> with a good current drive used for nothing else, a linear stream of data
> (no seeking and file system overhead), and a non PCI controller (PCI
> Express, host chipset bus etc).
That's Suspend2's usage pattern when given a whole partition, so I can
state without reservation you can get maximum throughput under those
circumstances, even with a PCI controller. Swsusp should do about the
same too.
Nigel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists