linux-kernel - Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Feb 2007 07:34:48 +1100
From:	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
To:	Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	"Martin A. Fink" <fink@....mpg.de>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

Hi Alan et al.

On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 19:08 +0000, Alan wrote:
> I'm not sure you'll get 50MB/sec sustained to work although you might
> with a good current drive used for nothing else, a linear stream of data
> (no seeking and file system overhead), and a non PCI controller (PCI
> Express, host chipset bus etc). 

That's Suspend2's usage pattern when given a whole partition, so I can
state without reservation you can get maximum throughput under those
circumstances, even with a PCI controller. Swsusp should do about the
same too.

Nigel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/