linux-kernel - Re: [QUESTION] Which dependency am I missing?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8d158e1f0702121428i4bcd350ane19642e2d90c29ee@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:28:03 +0100
From:	"Patrick Ale" <patrick.ale@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [QUESTION] Which dependency am I missing?

On 2/12/07, Patrick Ale <patrick.ale@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,

Disregard, I found the problem.
CONFIG_NEW_LED=Y , so I have to do a make and boot from the produced image.

Which brings me to another question.
If a dependent driver is selected as module (for reasons you dont want
to reboot and all), is it possible to have the dependencies built as
module aswell rather than being built into the kernel? for
CONFIG_NEW_LED I cant choose for built-in or module, it's built-in,
and that's all there is possible.

Patrick
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/