linux-kernel - Re: ARP hidden patch vs. arp ignore/announce

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0702131116070.31448@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:16:56 +0100 (MET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
cc:	Menny Hamburger <menny@...net.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ARP hidden patch vs. arp ignore/announce

On Feb 13 2007 09:52, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
>> If there is currently no way to provide this functionality using
>> arp_ignore/arp_annonce/arp_filter or their friends, why is this still a
>> patch
>> And is not integrated into the mainline kernel?
>
>eh? if you keep reading the doc it'll explain that there is arptables in
>the current kernels, which is like iptables for arp, and you can do very
>finegrained control with that, including the ignore stuff...
>

One thing remains, arptables can't do ebtables's -j arpreply. (That would have
been too great - I could get rid of the extra br0 interface!)

Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/