| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1171362301.12771.83.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:25:00 +0100 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> Cc: "Martin A. Fink" <fink@....mpg.de>, Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@...d.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 12:18 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> writes: > > > > > > > > The problem is: FreeBSD is fast, but lacks of some special drivers. Linux has > > > all drivers but access to harddisk is unpredictable and thus unreliable! > > > What can I do?? > > > > > > there's several tunables you can do; > > [...] Well Linux certainly should perform better out of the box > on such a simple configuration. no argument from me there; first need to find out which piece is wrong > > Something is wrong especially when the CPU usage is so high. I'll buy that, yet there's plenty of cpu time available so that shouldn't be all that much of a limit on the throughput... there's still headroom -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists