lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45D1A092.6030804@cosmosbay.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:27:14 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
CC:	"Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@...hscale.com>,
	Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>, patches@...-64.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [21/25] x86_64: a memcpy that tries to
 reduce cache pressure

Andi Kleen a écrit :
> From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@...hscale.com>
> 
> This copy routine is memcpy-compatible, but on some architectures will use
> cache-bypassing loads to avoid bringing the source data into the cache.
> 
> One case where this is useful is when a device issues a DMA to a memory
> region, and the CPU must copy the DMAed data elsewhere before doing any work
> with it.  Since the source data is read-once, write-never from the CPU's
> perspective, caching the data at those addresses can only evict potentially
> useful data.
> 
> We provide an x86_64 implementation that uses SSE non-temporal loads, and a
> generic version that falls back to plain memcpy.

> +	movq	%r11, 56(%rdi)
> +	addq	%rcx, %rdi
> +	cmpq	%rdx, %rcx	/* is rdx >= 64? */
> +	jbe	.L42
> +	sfence
> +	orl	%edx, %edx
> +	je	.L33

I have three questions/remarks

1) Just curious why sfence is necessary here ?

2) Shouldnt we use this for large buffers, and restrict them to a size 
multiple of 64, to avoid all these conditional branches ?

3) Also, the first 128 bytes of the source buffer will be bring into cache.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ