linux-kernel - Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:59:35 +0000
From:	Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org>
To:	Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	"Martin A. Fink" <fink@....mpg.de>,
	Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@...d.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

On Tue, 13 February 2007 11:27:58 +0000, Alan wrote:
> 
> isn't yet a heavily optimised libata path. Secondly erase block size
> matters with flash drives so the bigger each I/O the better erase block
> behaviour we should get.

Although that should max out somewhere between 16KiB and 128KiB,
depending on the chips being used.

Jörn

-- 
If you're willing to restrict the flexibility of your approach,
you can almost always do something better.
-- John Carmack
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/