[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070213121213.GI18101@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:12:13 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, akuster@...sta.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] PM: Adds remount fs ro at suspend
Hi!
> > Why do you think remounting filesystems is necessary? Are you getting
> > problems with some particular filesystem?
>
> No. But anything in a removable device neets to be either remounted
> read-only or unmounted if that is at all possible, because the user could
> unplug it. It is of course, sync'd anyway, so if the remount/umount fails,
> no corruption should happen... but the fs will be dirty, etc.
>
> It can get very ugly when you factor in docks and removable bays. It's not
> just USB/firewire mass-storage devices and memory cards. And there is the
> patological cases where the user suspends with the device in one port, and
> resumes with the device in another port.
>
> I feel userspace *can* do all that needs to be done, but we are (currently)
> very bad at it.
Fix it in userspace, then. fsck when you unplug disk while suspended
should serve as a reminder to fix that userspace :-).
(And yes, you may need some kernel support to do it nicely; hopefully
same kernel support that will solve users unplugging disks without
umount.)
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists