linux-kernel - Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200702131332.34899.fink@mpe.mpg.de>
Date:	Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:32:34 +0100
From:	"Martin A. Fink" <fink@....mpg.de>
To:	Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

Am Dienstag, 13. Februar 2007 12:25 schrieben Sie:
> > Well they do. The Flash disk I have (SATA-I) is capable of 48 MB/s and 
this 
> > value is reached over the whole disk size by windows as well as by 
FreeBSD. 
> > See my test results in the first thread.
> 
> Ok a flash disk should be more stable
> 
> > My Seagate Barracuda Harddisk drive (SATA-II) starts with 76 MB/s and 
> > decreases linearly to 35 MB/s due to the fact that it has to write to a 
> > rotating disk. But on a flash disk there is nothing rotating...
> 
> The hard disk one isn't guaranteed or stable but the flash especially if
> it is aimed at it ought to behave.
> 
> > So where is the difference between SATA-I and SATA-II ?
> 
> All physical side if they are on the same controller when you do the
> tests. Mostly latency,
> 
> > And why is FreeBSD able to write with constant rates (the complete 25 GB, 
all 
> > with 48+/-0.1 MB/s) but Linux 2.6.18 not ?
> 
> Does the FreeBSD fsync sync to media ? Also what controller is being used
> here, and do you have EHCI USB support running ?
Manual of FreeBSD fsync says it syncs to media.

I used the same controller: Same computer, same harddisk. two partitions on 
the system disk, one for linux, one for freebsd.

EHCI:

ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: EHCI Host Controller
ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00, driver 10 Dec 2004
usb usb1: Product: EHCI Host Controller

AHCI

ahci 0000:00:1f.2: AHCI 0001.0100 32 slots 4 ports 3 Gbps 0xf impl SATA mode

> 
> > With a dedicated (rotating) SATA II device, using the first 70% of disk 
space 
> > no problem -- tested ! With a SATA-I device only a problem with Linux 
2.6.18
> 
> I suspect the SATA-1 itself may not be the decider but something else -
> eg the hard disk using NCQ, which would cover up any latency related
> problems.
> 
> > Journaling of data: you are right, ext2 performs better than ext3.
> 
> And ext3 in writeback mode ought in theory (but practice is always
> harder ;)) be faster than ext2.
> 
> 

-- 
Dipl. Physiker
Martin Anton Fink
Max Planck Institute for extraterrestrial Physics
Giessenbachstrasse
85741 Garching
Germany
Tel. +49-(0)89-30000-3645
Fax. +49-(0)89-30000-3569
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/