linux-kernel - Re: somebody dropped a (warning) bomb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <27c8.45d1d5cf.69f9a@altium.nl>
Date:	Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:14:23 -0000
From:	dick.streefland@...ium.nl (Dick Streefland)
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: somebody dropped a (warning) bomb

Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de> wrote:
| Further, giving again answer to the question whether they generate signed or
| unsigned comparisons: Have you ever seen a computer which addresses memory with
| negative numbers? Since the answer is most likely no, signed comparisons would
| not make sense for me.

The Transputer has (had?) a signed address space:

http://maven.smith.edu/~thiebaut/transputer/chapter2/chap2-3.html

-- 
Dick Streefland                      ////                      Altium BV
dick.streefland@...ium.nl           (@ @)          http://www.altium.com
--------------------------------oOO--(_)--OOo---------------------------

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/