linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Re: [autofs] Bad race condition in the new autofs protocol somewhere

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070213155405.GA33765@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
Date:	Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:54:05 +0100
From:	Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>
To:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Cc:	Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
	"Hack inc." <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, autofs@...ux.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Re: [autofs] Bad race condition in the new autofs protocol somewhere

On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:07:27AM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Olivier Galibert wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:52:39AM +0900, Ian Kent wrote:
> >> Indeed.
> >> Which kernel can you use?
> >> I believe that 2200 had another problem so can you use an fc5 kernel
> >> later than that?
> > 
> > I've ported your patch to 2257 (nothing special, only moved lines),
> > and it seems to work beautifully.  I'm enlarging the testing.
> > 
> 
> If you get the patches into -stable they will end up in Fedora
> kernels automatically. 2288 (based on 2.6.19) is in testing now...

Don't they require autofs5 to be of any use though?  That's not going
to be in fc until it's out of beta I guess.

  OG.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/