lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F5201E1D1D0@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:45:37 -0800
From:	"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To:	"John" <linux.kernel@...e.fr>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	<jesse.brandeburg@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>, <bunk@...sta.de>,
	<jgarzik@...ox.com>, <saw@....sw.com.sg>
Subject: RE: Intel 82559 NIC corrupted EEPROM

John wrote:
> Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
>> What would you like to do?  At this stage I would like e100 to work
>> better than it is, but I'm not sure what to do next.
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
> I'm resurrecting this thread because it appears we'll need to support
> these motherboards for several months to come, yet Adrian Bunk has
> scheduled the removal of eepro100 in January 2007.
> 
> To recap, we have to support ~30 EBC-2000T motherboards.
> http://www.adlinktech.com/PD/web/PD_detail.php?pid=213
> These motherboards come with three on-board Intel 82559 NICs.
> 
> Last time I checked, i.e. two months ago, e100 did not correctly
> initialize all three NICs on these motherboards. Therefore, we've been
> using eepro100.
> 
> I will be testing the latest 2.6.20 kernel to see if the situation has
> changed, but I wanted to let you all know that there are still some
> eepro100 users out there, out of necessity.

John, I've made this patch against 2.6.20 to enable IO access for e100,
in the hope it might change something with the timings. I smoke tested
it against one e100 in one of my machines, and I disabled the Mem bit in
the COMMAND register after loading the driver to make sure that it
wasn't using memory access to the registers.

Please test with insmod e100.ko use_io=1

The patch is actually short, considering the magnitude of the change,
its inline and attached in case my mailer corrupts it.

Please let me know if it changes something, I still believe this is
something very specific to your systems (or more likely the eeprom on
your systems)

== begin patch ==

e100: try using io only
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
---

 drivers/net/e100.c |   74
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/e100.c b/drivers/net/e100.c
index 0cefef5..df3d2e7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e100.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e100.c
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ #include <asm/unaligned.h>
 
 #define DRV_NAME		"e100"
 #define DRV_EXT			"-NAPI"
-#define DRV_VERSION		"3.5.17-k2"DRV_EXT
+#define DRV_VERSION		"3.5.17-k2_iodebug"DRV_EXT
 #define DRV_DESCRIPTION		"Intel(R) PRO/100 Network
Driver"
 #define DRV_COPYRIGHT		"Copyright(c) 1999-2006 Intel
Corporation"
 #define PFX			DRV_NAME ": "
@@ -174,10 +174,13 @@ MODULE_VERSION(DRV_VERSION);
 
 static int debug = 3;
 static int eeprom_bad_csum_allow = 0;
+static int use_io = 0;
 module_param(debug, int, 0);
 module_param(eeprom_bad_csum_allow, int, 0);
+module_param(use_io, int, 0);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Debug level (0=none,...,16=all)");
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(eeprom_bad_csum_allow, "Allow bad eeprom checksums");
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(use_io, "Force use of i/o access mode");
 #define DPRINTK(nlevel, klevel, fmt, args...) \
 	(void)((NETIF_MSG_##nlevel & nic->msg_enable) && \
 	printk(KERN_##klevel PFX "%s: %s: " fmt, nic->netdev->name, \
@@ -591,7 +594,7 @@ static inline void e100_write_flush(stru
 {
 	/* Flush previous PCI writes through intermediate bridges
 	 * by doing a benign read */
-	(void)readb(&nic->csr->scb.status);
+	(void)ioread8(&nic->csr->scb.status);
 }
 
 static void e100_enable_irq(struct nic *nic)
@@ -599,7 +602,7 @@ static void e100_enable_irq(struct nic *
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&nic->cmd_lock, flags);
-	writeb(irq_mask_none, &nic->csr->scb.cmd_hi);
+	iowrite8(irq_mask_none, &nic->csr->scb.cmd_hi);
 	e100_write_flush(nic);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&nic->cmd_lock, flags);
 }
@@ -609,7 +612,7 @@ static void e100_disable_irq(struct nic 
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&nic->cmd_lock, flags);
-	writeb(irq_mask_all, &nic->csr->scb.cmd_hi);
+	iowrite8(irq_mask_all, &nic->csr->scb.cmd_hi);
 	e100_write_flush(nic);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&nic->cmd_lock, flags);
 }
@@ -618,11 +621,11 @@ static void e100_hw_reset(struct nic *ni
 {
 	/* Put CU and RU into idle with a selective reset to get
 	 * device off of PCI bus */
-	writel(selective_reset, &nic->csr->port);
+	iowrite32(selective_reset, &nic->csr->port);
 	e100_write_flush(nic); udelay(20);
 
 	/* Now fully reset device */
-	writel(software_reset, &nic->csr->port);
+	iowrite32(software_reset, &nic->csr->port);
 	e100_write_flush(nic); udelay(20);
 
 	/* Mask off our interrupt line - it's unmasked after reset */
@@ -639,7 +642,7 @@ static int e100_self_test(struct nic *ni
 	nic->mem->selftest.signature = 0;
 	nic->mem->selftest.result = 0xFFFFFFFF;
 
-	writel(selftest | dma_addr, &nic->csr->port);
+	iowrite32(selftest | dma_addr, &nic->csr->port);
 	e100_write_flush(nic);
 	/* Wait 10 msec for self-test to complete */
 	msleep(10);
@@ -677,23 +680,23 @@ static void e100_eeprom_write(struct nic
 	for(j = 0; j < 3; j++) {
 
 		/* Chip select */
-		writeb(eecs | eesk, &nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
+		iowrite8(eecs | eesk, &nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
 		e100_write_flush(nic); udelay(4);
 
 		for(i = 31; i >= 0; i--) {
 			ctrl = (cmd_addr_data[j] & (1 << i)) ?
 				eecs | eedi : eecs;
-			writeb(ctrl, &nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
+			iowrite8(ctrl, &nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
 			e100_write_flush(nic); udelay(4);
 
-			writeb(ctrl | eesk, &nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
+			iowrite8(ctrl | eesk,
&nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
 			e100_write_flush(nic); udelay(4);
 		}
 		/* Wait 10 msec for cmd to complete */
 		msleep(10);
 
 		/* Chip deselect */
-		writeb(0, &nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
+		iowrite8(0, &nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
 		e100_write_flush(nic); udelay(4);
 	}
 };
@@ -709,21 +712,21 @@ static u16 e100_eeprom_read(struct nic *
 	cmd_addr_data = ((op_read << *addr_len) | addr) << 16;
 
 	/* Chip select */
-	writeb(eecs | eesk, &nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
+	iowrite8(eecs | eesk, &nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
 	e100_write_flush(nic); udelay(4);
 
 	/* Bit-bang to read word from eeprom */
 	for(i = 31; i >= 0; i--) {
 		ctrl = (cmd_addr_data & (1 << i)) ? eecs | eedi : eecs;
-		writeb(ctrl, &nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
+		iowrite8(ctrl, &nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
 		e100_write_flush(nic); udelay(4);
 
-		writeb(ctrl | eesk, &nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
+		iowrite8(ctrl | eesk, &nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
 		e100_write_flush(nic); udelay(4);
 
 		/* Eeprom drives a dummy zero to EEDO after receiving
 		 * complete address.  Use this to adjust addr_len. */
-		ctrl = readb(&nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
+		ctrl = ioread8(&nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
 		if(!(ctrl & eedo) && i > 16) {
 			*addr_len -= (i - 16);
 			i = 17;
@@ -733,7 +736,7 @@ static u16 e100_eeprom_read(struct nic *
 	}
 
 	/* Chip deselect */
-	writeb(0, &nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
+	iowrite8(0, &nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
 	e100_write_flush(nic); udelay(4);
 
 	return le16_to_cpu(data);
@@ -804,7 +807,7 @@ static int e100_exec_cmd(struct nic *nic
 
 	/* Previous command is accepted when SCB clears */
 	for(i = 0; i < E100_WAIT_SCB_TIMEOUT; i++) {
-		if(likely(!readb(&nic->csr->scb.cmd_lo)))
+		if(likely(!ioread8(&nic->csr->scb.cmd_lo)))
 			break;
 		cpu_relax();
 		if(unlikely(i > E100_WAIT_SCB_FAST))
@@ -816,8 +819,8 @@ static int e100_exec_cmd(struct nic *nic
 	}
 
 	if(unlikely(cmd != cuc_resume))
-		writel(dma_addr, &nic->csr->scb.gen_ptr);
-	writeb(cmd, &nic->csr->scb.cmd_lo);
+		iowrite32(dma_addr, &nic->csr->scb.gen_ptr);
+	iowrite8(cmd, &nic->csr->scb.cmd_lo);
 
 err_unlock:
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&nic->cmd_lock, flags);
@@ -895,7 +898,7 @@ static u16 mdio_ctrl(struct nic *nic, u3
 	 */
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&nic->mdio_lock, flags);
 	for (i = 100; i; --i) {
-		if (readl(&nic->csr->mdi_ctrl) & mdi_ready)
+		if (ioread32(&nic->csr->mdi_ctrl) & mdi_ready)
 			break;
 		udelay(20);
 	}
@@ -905,11 +908,11 @@ static u16 mdio_ctrl(struct nic *nic, u3
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&nic->mdio_lock, flags);
 		return 0;		/* No way to indicate timeout
error */
 	}
-	writel((reg << 16) | (addr << 21) | dir | data,
&nic->csr->mdi_ctrl);
+	iowrite32((reg << 16) | (addr << 21) | dir | data,
&nic->csr->mdi_ctrl);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
 		udelay(20);
-		if ((data_out = readl(&nic->csr->mdi_ctrl)) & mdi_ready)
+		if ((data_out = ioread32(&nic->csr->mdi_ctrl)) &
mdi_ready)
 			break;
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&nic->mdio_lock, flags);
@@ -1318,7 +1321,7 @@ static inline int e100_exec_cb_wait(stru
 	}
 
 	/* ack any interupts, something could have been set */
-	writeb(~0, &nic->csr->scb.stat_ack);
+	iowrite8(~0, &nic->csr->scb.stat_ack);
 
 	/* if the command failed, or is not OK, notify and return */
 	if (!counter || !(cb->status & cpu_to_le16(cb_ok))) {
@@ -1580,7 +1583,7 @@ static void e100_watchdog(unsigned long 
 	 * accidentally, due to hardware that shares a register between
the
 	 * interrupt mask bit and the SW Interrupt generation bit */
 	spin_lock_irq(&nic->cmd_lock);
-	writeb(readb(&nic->csr->scb.cmd_hi) |
irq_sw_gen,&nic->csr->scb.cmd_hi);
+	iowrite8(ioread8(&nic->csr->scb.cmd_hi) |
irq_sw_gen,&nic->csr->scb.cmd_hi);
 	e100_write_flush(nic);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&nic->cmd_lock);
 
@@ -1893,7 +1896,7 @@ static void e100_rx_clean(struct nic *ni
 
 	if(restart_required) {
 		// ack the rnr?
-		writeb(stat_ack_rnr, &nic->csr->scb.stat_ack);
+		iowrite8(stat_ack_rnr, &nic->csr->scb.stat_ack);
 		e100_start_receiver(nic, rx_to_start);
 		if(work_done)
 			(*work_done)++;
@@ -1952,7 +1955,7 @@ static irqreturn_t e100_intr(int irq, vo
 {
 	struct net_device *netdev = dev_id;
 	struct nic *nic = netdev_priv(netdev);
-	u8 stat_ack = readb(&nic->csr->scb.stat_ack);
+	u8 stat_ack = ioread8(&nic->csr->scb.stat_ack);
 
 	DPRINTK(INTR, DEBUG, "stat_ack = 0x%02X\n", stat_ack);
 
@@ -1961,7 +1964,7 @@ static irqreturn_t e100_intr(int irq, vo
 		return IRQ_NONE;
 
 	/* Ack interrupt(s) */
-	writeb(stat_ack, &nic->csr->scb.stat_ack);
+	iowrite8(stat_ack, &nic->csr->scb.stat_ack);
 
 	/* We hit Receive No Resource (RNR); restart RU after cleaning
*/
 	if(stat_ack & stat_ack_rnr)
@@ -2107,7 +2110,7 @@ static void e100_tx_timeout_task(struct 
 	struct net_device *netdev = nic->netdev;
 
 	DPRINTK(TX_ERR, DEBUG, "scb.status=0x%02X\n",
-		readb(&nic->csr->scb.status));
+		ioread8(&nic->csr->scb.status));
 	e100_down(netdev_priv(netdev));
 	e100_up(netdev_priv(netdev));
 }
@@ -2230,9 +2233,9 @@ static void e100_get_regs(struct net_dev
 	int i;
 
 	regs->version = (1 << 24) | nic->rev_id;
-	buff[0] = readb(&nic->csr->scb.cmd_hi) << 24 |
-		readb(&nic->csr->scb.cmd_lo) << 16 |
-		readw(&nic->csr->scb.status);
+	buff[0] = ioread8(&nic->csr->scb.cmd_hi) << 24 |
+		ioread8(&nic->csr->scb.cmd_lo) << 16 |
+		ioread16(&nic->csr->scb.status);
 	for(i = E100_PHY_REGS; i >= 0; i--)
 		buff[1 + E100_PHY_REGS - i] =
 			mdio_read(netdev, nic->mii.phy_id, i);
@@ -2604,7 +2607,10 @@ #endif
 	SET_MODULE_OWNER(netdev);
 	SET_NETDEV_DEV(netdev, &pdev->dev);
 
-	nic->csr = ioremap(pci_resource_start(pdev, 0), sizeof(struct
csr));
+	if (use_io)
+		DPRINTK(PROBE, INFO, "using i/o access mode\n");
+
+	nic->csr = pci_iomap(pdev, (use_io ? 1 : 0), sizeof(struct
csr));
 	if(!nic->csr) {
 		DPRINTK(PROBE, ERR, "Cannot map device registers,
aborting.\n");
 		err = -ENOMEM;
@@ -2676,7 +2682,7 @@ #endif
 
 	DPRINTK(PROBE, INFO, "addr 0x%llx, irq %d, "
 		"MAC addr %02X:%02X:%02X:%02X:%02X:%02X\n",
-		(unsigned long long)pci_resource_start(pdev, 0),
pdev->irq,
+		(unsigned long long)pci_resource_start(pdev, use_io ? 1
: 0), pdev->irq,
 		netdev->dev_addr[0], netdev->dev_addr[1],
netdev->dev_addr[2],
 		netdev->dev_addr[3], netdev->dev_addr[4],
netdev->dev_addr[5]);
 
@@ -2685,7 +2691,7 @@ #endif
 err_out_free:
 	e100_free(nic);
 err_out_iounmap:
-	iounmap(nic->csr);
+	pci_iounmap(pdev, nic->csr);
 err_out_free_res:
 	pci_release_regions(pdev);
 err_out_disable_pdev:


Download attachment "e100_io_enable.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (10022 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ