[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1ejotspot.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:38:58 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...nvz.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...nvz.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix SAK_work workqueue initialization.
Somewhere in the rewrite of the work queues my cleanup of SAK handling
got broken. Maybe I didn't retest it properly or possibly the API
was changing so fast I missed something. Regardless currently
triggering a SAK now generates an ugly BUG_ON and kills the kernel.
Thanks to Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...nvz.org> for spotting this.
This modifies the use of SAK_work to initialize it when the data
structure it resides in is initialized, and to simply call
schedule_work when we need to generate a SAK. I update both
data structures that have a SAK_work member for consistency.
All of the old PREPARE_WORK calls that are now gone.
If we call schedule_work again before it has processed it
has generated the first SAK it will simply ignore the duplicate
schedule_work request.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
drivers/char/keyboard.c | 1 -
drivers/char/sysrq.c | 1 -
drivers/char/tty_io.c | 3 +--
drivers/char/vt.c | 1 +
4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/keyboard.c b/drivers/char/keyboard.c
index c654a3e..cb8d691 100644
--- a/drivers/char/keyboard.c
+++ b/drivers/char/keyboard.c
@@ -596,7 +596,6 @@ static void fn_spawn_con(struct vc_data *vc)
static void fn_SAK(struct vc_data *vc)
{
struct work_struct *SAK_work = &vc_cons[fg_console].SAK_work;
- PREPARE_WORK(SAK_work, vc_SAK);
schedule_work(SAK_work);
}
diff --git a/drivers/char/sysrq.c b/drivers/char/sysrq.c
index 3757610..be73c80 100644
--- a/drivers/char/sysrq.c
+++ b/drivers/char/sysrq.c
@@ -89,7 +89,6 @@ static struct sysrq_key_op sysrq_loglevel_op = {
static void sysrq_handle_SAK(int key, struct tty_struct *tty)
{
struct work_struct *SAK_work = &vc_cons[fg_console].SAK_work;
- PREPARE_WORK(SAK_work, vc_SAK);
schedule_work(SAK_work);
}
static struct sysrq_key_op sysrq_SAK_op = {
diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_io.c b/drivers/char/tty_io.c
index 65672c5..5289254 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tty_io.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tty_io.c
@@ -3442,7 +3442,6 @@ void do_SAK(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
if (!tty)
return;
- PREPARE_WORK(&tty->SAK_work, do_SAK_work);
schedule_work(&tty->SAK_work);
}
@@ -3568,7 +3567,7 @@ static void initialize_tty_struct(struct tty_struct *tty)
mutex_init(&tty->atomic_write_lock);
spin_lock_init(&tty->read_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tty->tty_files);
- INIT_WORK(&tty->SAK_work, NULL);
+ INIT_WORK(&tty->SAK_work, do_SAK_work);
}
/*
diff --git a/drivers/char/vt.c b/drivers/char/vt.c
index 94ce3e7..c3f8e38 100644
--- a/drivers/char/vt.c
+++ b/drivers/char/vt.c
@@ -2635,6 +2635,7 @@ static int __init con_init(void)
*/
for (currcons = 0; currcons < MIN_NR_CONSOLES; currcons++) {
vc_cons[currcons].d = vc = alloc_bootmem(sizeof(struct vc_data));
+ INIT_WORK(&vc_cons[currcons].SAK_work, vc_SAK);
visual_init(vc, currcons, 1);
vc->vc_screenbuf = (unsigned short *)alloc_bootmem(vc->vc_screenbuf_size);
vc->vc_kmalloced = 0;
--
1.4.4.1.g278f
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists