linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.20 new perfmon code base + libpfm + pfmon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <p737iulhcfb.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
Date:	14 Feb 2007 00:20:56 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	eranian@....hp.com, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	perfctr-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, perfmon@...ali.hpl.hp.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: 2.6.20 new perfmon code base + libpfm + pfmon

Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:

> > On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:48:39 -0800 Stephane Eranian <eranian@....hp.com> wrote:
> > I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
> 
> Can we have a bug push to get this merged up please?

Yes, there certainly seems to be user interest in this.

I've been merging the x86 specific infrastructure Stephane sent.
So hopefully the basics are there already.

The big open question was still the review of the syscall interface.
Probably needs some determined reviewers.

I did a review of some of the basic low level code some time ago;
there were some issues but I believe they are probably all resolved
by now (but I haven't verified that recently) 

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/