linux-kernel - Re: Coding style RFC: convert "for (i=0;i<ARRAY_SIZE(array);i++)" to "array_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45D13C34.2040400@yahoo.com.au>
Date:	Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:19:00 +1100
From:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC:	Ben Nizette <ben.nizette@...et.net.au>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Coding style RFC: convert "for (i=0;i<ARRAY_SIZE(array);i++)"
 to "array_for_each(index, array)"

Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 11:20 +1100, Ben Nizette wrote:
> 
>>  #define array_for_each(element, array) \
>>	for (int __idx = 0; __idx < ARRAY_SIZE((array)); \
>>		__idx++, (element) = &(array[__idx]))
> 
> 
> This requires all interior loop code be changed.

Ben is right though. Making this thing confusing to use is going
to be worse than sticking with the very simple and unconfusing
loops.

If you really wanted to introduce your loop, then please call it
array_for_each_idx, or something to distinguish it.

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/