linux-kernel - Re: Will smp alternative try to patch init text also?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:42:09 +0530
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>
To:	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...e.de>
Cc:	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
Subject: Re: Will smp alternative try to patch init text also?

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:51:31AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > So what happens if somebody builds a SMP kernel and runs on a UP machine.
> > Later it hotplus one CPU. Then kernel will switch to SMP mode. Looking
> > at the code it looks like it will also try to patch init text which is
> > no more there and will corrupt something else? 
> 
> There are range checks for both kernel (_text -> _etext) and modules
> (.text section).  Anything outside isn't patched.
> 

Oh... I missed that. Thanks.

Vivek
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/