[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877iuknbp9.fsf@javad.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:52:18 +0300
From: Sergei Organov <osv@...ad.com>
To: Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"J.A. MagallÃón"
<jamagallon@....com>, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: somebody dropped a (warning) bomb
Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:06:24PM +0300, Sergei Organov wrote:
[...]
>> May I suggest another definition for a warning being entirely sucks?
>> "The warning is entirely sucks if and only if it never has true
>> positives." In all other cases it's only more or less sucks, IMHO.
>
> That means a warning that triggers on every line saying "there may be
> a bug there" does not entirely suck?
You got me. This warning is indeed entirely sucks. My definition is
poor.
-- Sergei.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists