linux-kernel - Linus' laptop and Num lock status

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:56:01 -0700
From:	Dax Kelson <dax@...ulabs.com>
To:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Subject: Linus' laptop and Num lock status

According to the lore(1) the reason that the kernel unconditionally
turns off the num lock was so that Linus' laptop came up ready to type.

The issue is that if you force num lock on, then laptop users are messed
up since for most laptops your keyboard changes as follows:

7890 = 789*
 uiop = 456-
  jkl; = 123+
   m./ = 0./

So the only safe choice is "force off" or "Follow BIOS" (preferable).

Are there any technical or political reasons why kernel can't change
from "force off" to "Follow BIOS"?

Some distributions implement "Follow BIOS" in their bootup scripts but
the most just follow the kernel. IMHO, it would be very nice if the
"Follow BIOS" was done by the kernel so this would Just Work(tm)
everywhere in all situations (such as rescue environments where the
normal bootup scripts aren't processed).

Thanks,
Dax Kelson

(1)
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2003-September/msg00713.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/