[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070214210251.GA15025@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:02:51 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@....com.au>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 05/11] syslets: core code
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> And the whole "lock things down in memory" approach is bad. It's doing
> expensive things like mlock(), making the overhead for _single_ system
> calls much more expensive. [...]
hm, there must be some misunderstanding here. That mlock is /only/ once
per the lifetime of the whole 'head' - i.e. per sys_async_register().
(And you can even forget i ever did it - it's 5 lines of code to turn
the completion ring into a swappable entity.)
never does any MMU trick ever enter the picture during the whole
operation of this thing, and that's very much intentional.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists