[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070214220443.GN32271@kvack.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:04:44 -0500
From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@....com.au>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: split FPU state from task state
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:49:44PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> this can very much be done, with a straightforward extension of how we
> handle FPU state. That makes sense independently of syslets/async as
> well, so find below the standalone patch from Arjan. It's in my current
> syslet queue and works great.
That patch adds a bunch of memory dereferences and another allocation
to the thread creation code path -- a tax that all users must pay. Granted,
it's small, but at the very least should be configurable out for the 99.9%
of users that will never use this functionality.
I'm willing to be convinced, it's just that I would like to see some
numbers that scream out that this is a good thing.
-ben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists