[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45D39F20.4050907@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:45:36 +0100
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@...il.com>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
Subject: Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> Why a new flag?
>
> For example, there are drivers that define .suspend() and .resume() which
> do not work correctly and we can use the flag to mark them.
Depending on how serious the problems with these .suspend/.resume()s
are, you could also put a printk in them or #if 0 bad_code #else return
-ENOSYS #endif around them.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists