[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1171527194.12771.575.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:13:13 +0100
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: v j <vj.linux@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 00:04 -0800, v j wrote:
> On 2/14/07, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 21:16 -0800, v j wrote:
> > > This is in reference to the following thread:
> > >
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/14/63
> > >
> > > I am not sure if this is ever addressed in LKML, but linux is _very_
> > > popular in the embedded space. We (an embedded vendor) chose Linux 3
> > > years back because of its lack of royalty model, robustness and
> > > availability of infinite number of open-source tools.
> >
> >
> > I think you have a bit of a misunderstanding... Linux is not royalty
> > free. Just the royalty is not in the form of cash, but in the form of
> > having to give your improvements back to the open source world.
>
> Sure. But this is not legally binding.
that's a legal conclusion that is ... iffy at least. I'm not a lawyer,
but I suggest you talk to a real one before making that conclusion, and
you'll see it's not as simple as that.
--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists