linux-kernel - Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45D42B93.3060209@garzik.org>
Date:	Thu, 15 Feb 2007 04:44:51 -0500
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, v j <vj.linux@...il.com>,
	Trent Waddington <trent.waddington@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers

Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:46:13PM -0800, v j wrote:
>  > Using our source code would not benefit anybody but
>  > our competitors.
> 
> This excuse has been given time and time again, and repeatedly been 
> proven false.  And as soon as one of your competitors makes their
> drivers open, guess which one gets 1000+ free developers working
> on their code ?


Customers also like to buy hardware where they -know- support will not 
disappear in a year, when the vendor releases a new chip.

In fact, in some markets, the engineers who wrote the code have often 
moved to the next project, by the time the customers actually get their 
hands on the end result.  Open source means that problems found in real 
world field testing can be readily debugged and fixed.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/