[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0702151408490.786@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:09:40 +0100 (MET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
cc: v j <vj.linux@...il.com>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
On Feb 15 2007 18:43, Neil Brown wrote:
>> > We seem to have different definitions of open and closed.
>>
>> Open = 3rd party Linux drivers can be loaded. Closed = No third party
>> Linux drivers can be loaded.
>
>Loading a driver is not at issue. Anyone may load a driver.
And, after all, because loading is not distribution, you may
rip out export_symbol_gpl and use sysfs directly. It does not
make legal things any safer though, I'd say [ianal].
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists