[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1171559098.20758.70.camel@sinatra.austin.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:04:58 -0600
From: John Rose <johnrose@...tin.ibm.com>
To: Jan-Bernd Themann <ossthema@...ibm.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Christoph Raisch <RAISCH@...ibm.com>,
Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ppc <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
Marcus Eder <MEDER@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Klein <tklein@...ibm.com>, stefan.roscher@...ibm.com,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Nathan Fontenot <nfont@...tin.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc1] ehea: dynamic add / remove port
> Second, the probe and remove functions do not communicate whether an add
> or remove was successful. Combine this with the lack of port
> information in the adapter sysfs directory, and the userspace tool has
> no way of verifying a dynamic add/remove.
One way to communicate a return code is by making the sysfs interface
file read/write, and having the read callback give a return code. For
an example of this, you can look at drivers/pci/rpadlpar_sysfs.c and
rpadlpar_core.c.
It would still be nice to have some way from the adapter sysfs directory
to list/examine logical ports. Symlinks would work, but it would be
even nicer to have a new kobject per port with attribute files for
logical id, state, etc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists