[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <909AD75B-3A4F-49BA-BF47-D143D2B01B71@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:25:16 -0800
From: Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
To: "Ananiev, Leonid I" <leonid.i.ananiev@...el.com>
Cc: "Ken Chen" <kenchen@...gle.com>, <suparna@...ibm.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-aio" <linux-aio@...ck.org>,
"Chris Mason" <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: fix kernel bug when page is temporally busy
> If invalidate_inode_pages2_range() will return EIOCBRETRY as the patch
> "aio: fix kernel bug when page is temporally busy"
Sorry Leonid, this patch is not safe.
It returns -EIOCBRETRY without guaranteeing that kick_iocb() will be
called. This can lead to operations hanging, both AIO and calls that
come through do_sync_{read,write}.
It overwrites -EIOCBQUEUED, leading to an aio_complete() while a
retry is happening. This can lead to reference count confusion.
Double-frees, referencing freed memory, that kind of thing. This
isn't a new problem. The current code that overwrites with -EIO has
this problem. But moving to -EIOCBRETRY does introduce new behaviour
of aio_complete() and the retry path racing.
I'll have a candidate patch to address the problem of EIO being
raised on the way back up from a path which has returned -EIOCBQUEUED.
- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists