[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200702152026.08541.dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:26:08 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: bert hubert <bert.hubert@...herlabs.nl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@....com.au>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 05/11] syslets: core code
On Thursday 15 February 2007 19:46, bert hubert wrote:
> Both 1 and 2 are currently limiting factors when I enter the 100kqps domain
> of name serving. This doesn't mean the rest of my code is as tight as it
> could be, but I spend a significant portion of time in the kernel even at
> moderate (10kqps effective) loads, even though I already use epoll. A busy
> PowerDNS recursor typically spends 25% to 50% of its time on 'sy' load.
Well, I guess in your workload most of system overhead is because of sockets
creation/destruction, UDP/IP stack work, nic driver, interrupts... I really
doubt async_io could help you... Do you have some oprofile results to share
with us ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists