[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <p73sld7f96t.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
Date: 15 Feb 2007 21:38:18 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Juan Piernas Canovas <piernas@...ec.um.es>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
sfaibish <sfaibish@....com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] DualFS: File System with Meta-data and Data Separation
Juan Piernas Canovas <piernas@...ec.um.es> writes:
[playing devil's advocate here]
> If the data and meta-data devices of DualFS can be on different disks,
> DualFS is able to READ and WRITE data and meta-data blocks in
> PARALLEL.
XFS can do this too using its real time volumes (which don't contain
any metadata). It can also have a separate log.
Also many storage subsystems have some internal parallelism
in writing (e.g. a RAID can write on different disks in parallel for
a single partition) so i'm not sure your distinction is that useful.
If you stripe two disks with a standard fs versus use one of them
as metadata volume and the other as data volume with dualfs i would
expect the striped variant usually be faster because it will give
parallelism not only to data versus metadata, but also to all data
versus other data.
Also I would expect your design to be slow for metadata read intensive
workloads. E.g. have you tried to boot a root partition with dual fs?
That's a very important IO benchmark for desktop Linux systems.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists