[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <906FD21B-59B6-4A30-90F0-914E0CD3CFBF@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:35:22 -0600
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] local_t : powerpc extension - use long for powerpc32
On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:02 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Kumar Gala (galak@...nel.crashing.org) wrote:
>> is there a reason this isn't local_add_return(long a, local_t *l) on
>> ppc32?
>>
>> (same comment for other functions)
>>
>> - k
>
> no, except that we use the code is taken from atomic.h and used an
> int parameter. However, due to the semantics of local_t, we should
> manipulate longs instead of ints, even if they are the same size on a
> given architecture (ppc32 and mips32 are affectec by this).
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Right, this means we can simply for ppc version down to:
+static __inline__ int local_add_return(int a, local_t *l)
+{
+ int t;
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+"1: PPC_LLARX %0,0,%2 # local_add_return\n\
+ add %0,%1,%0\n"
+ PPC405_ERR77(0,%2)
+" PPC_STLCX %0,0,%2 \n\
+ bne- 1b"
+ : "=&r" (t)
+ : "r" (a), "r" (&(l->a.counter))
+ : "cc", "memory");
+
+ return t;
+}
and that should work for both ppc32 & ppc64 and removes the
duplication between the two.
- k
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists