[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1171576397.3473.10.camel@gimli.at.home>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:53:17 +0100
From: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...mix.at>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: Ben Nizette <ben.nizette@...et.net.au>, v j <vj.linux@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 18:40 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Ben Nizette wrote:
[...]
> > Question to the world here: Distros make, as a matter of course, a
> > series of modifications to the Linux Kernel so that their modules or
> > features work. What stops VJ making a patchset which effectively
> > s/EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL/EXPORT_SYMBOL/g 's the kernel source then
> > distributing that under the GPL? He then supplies his un-GPL'd modules
Nothing. But it is pointless since that doesn't un-GPL source code.
[...]
> Rhetorical question: what stops me from taking somebody's copyrighted
> work, stripping the copyrights or falsely claiming to have a license
> to redistribute it, then selling it?
No one.
But that doesn't make the action legal or change the copyright/authors
rights in anyway (at least in the more civilized parts of the world).
Bernd
--
Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
Embedded Linux Development and Services
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists