| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:31:46 -0600 From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca> To: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <linux-os@...logic.com>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Cc: Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@...il.com> Subject: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote: > There are a lot of device drivers that will never make it into the > mainline kernel because they are for one-of-a-kind devices or boards > that companies embed into their products. Nobody would even want a > copy of the software to interface with something that they would > never even have. When Version 2.6 started, it became necessary to > use special tools and procedures to compile a module that was not > inside the mainline kernel. However, it was still quite easy. Recently, > somebody, apparently with an advanced degree in obfuscation, has made > that more difficult. This is abuse, pure and simple. That, in my > opinion, is one of the major reasons why people who use Linux in > embedded systems end up using very old versions. What are you talking about? There's nothing wrong with external module compilation in current kernels. You need about a 5-line makefile that calls the kernel build system, and it works fine. -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@...pamshaw.ca Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists